The initial issue that triggered this rework is that the forced storage in
database was working only on writes, and was never applied on attachment
creations.
This feature is used to store small files that need to be read in a fast way in
database rather than in the object storage. Reading a file from the object
storage can take 150-200ms, which is fine for downloading a PDF file or a single
image, but not if you need 40 thumbnails.
Down the path to make a correction, I found that:
* the logic to force storage was called in `_inverse_datas`, which is not called
during a create
* odoo implemented a new method `_get_datas_related_values`, which is a model
method that receive only the data and the mimetype, and return the attachment
values and write the file to the correct place
The `_get_datas_related_values` is where we want to plug this special storage,
as it is called for create and write, and already handle the values and
conditional write. But using this method, we have less information than before
about the attachment, so let's review the different criterias we had before:
* res_model: we were using it to always store attachments related to
'ir.ui.view' in db, because assets are related to this model. However, we
don't really need to check this: we should store any javascript and css
documents in database.
* exclude res_model: we could have an exclusion list, to tell that for instance,
for mail.message, we should never store any image in db. We don't have this
information anymore, but I think it was never used and added "in case of".
Because the default configuration is "mail.mail" and "mail.message" and I
couldn't find any attachment with such res_model in any of our biggest
databases. So this is removed.
* mimetype and data (size) are the last criteria and we still have them
The new system is only based on mimetype and data size and I think it's actually
more versatile. Previously, we could set a global size and include mimetypes,
but we couldn't say "I want to store all images below 50KB and all files of type
X below 10KB". Now, we have a single system parameter with a dict configuration
(`ir_attachment.storage.force.database`) defaulting to:
{"image/": 51200, "application/javascript": 0, "text/css": 0}
Assets have a limit of zero, which means they will all be stored in the database
whatever their size is.
Overall, this is a great simplification of the module too, as the method
`_get_datas_related_values` integrates it better in the base calls of IrAttachment.
Note for upgrade:
I doubt we customized the previous system parameters which are now obsolete, but
if yes, the configuration may need to be moved to `ir_attachment.storage.force.database`.
For the record, the params were:
* mimetypes.list.storedb (default: image)
* file.maxsize.storedb (default: 51200)
* excluded.models.storedb (mail.message,mail.mail), no equivalent now
The method IrAttachment.force_storage_to_db_for_special_fields() should be called
through a migration script on existing databases to move the attachments back into
the database.
AWS_BUCKETNAME is only needed in order to write on the bucket, but
read-only access should be allowed for other environments.
Fixes bug introduced by 6c3b610610
Curently the name of the bucket is cross checked with the
running environment. In rare case you can have a bucket name
that doesn't match the structure <project>-odoo-<env> in place.
The labs env can be anything starting by 'labs', such as
'labs-logistics', 'labs-finance', ...
* At install, s3/swift is set as default storage
* However, unlike prod/integration, the storage is not forced to be an
object storage
* Redis is required
* When the storage is set on s3/swift, then the bucket name is mandatory
(otherwise, there is no place where to create the files...)
The redis prefix regex match is relaxed: anything starting by a project
name, then '-odoo-', then any combination of letters, digits, and dashes
is accepted (so a prefix my-project9-odoo-labs-web3 is valid).
Some attachments (e.g. image_small, image_medium) are stored in DB
instead of the object storage for faster access.
In some situations, we may have pushed all these files on the Object
Storage (migration from a filesystem to object storage) and want to
bring back these attachments from the object storage to the database.
This method is not called anywhere but can be called by RPC or scripts.
Telmo Santos
Iryna Vushnevska
Guewen BaconnierandIryna Vushnevska
Stéphane Bidoul
Andreas PerhabandPaul
Akim Juillerat
Patrick TombezandGitHub
Mussie SirakandPatrick Tombez
Yannick VaucherandGitHub
Simone Orsi
Vincent RenavilleandGitHub
Denis LeemannandGitHub
Simone OrsiandGitHub
Alexandre Fayolle
CharlineDumontetandGitHub
Tonow-c2c
sebalix